| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha : |
19/07/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
20/07/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
LEADLEY, P.; GONZALEZ, A.; OBURA, D.; KRUG, C.B.; LONDOÑO-MURCIA, M.C.; MILLETTE, K.L.; RADULOVICI, A.; RANKOVIC, A.; SHANNON, L.J.; ARCHER, E.; ATO ARMAH, F.; NIC BAX, N,; CHAUDHARI, K.; COSTELLO, M.J.; DÁVALOS, L.M.; ROQUE, F DE O; DECLERCK, F.; DEE, L.E.; ESSL, F.; FERRIER, S.; GENOVESI, P.; GUARIGUATA, M.R.; HASHIMOTO, S.; IFEJIKA SPERANZA, CH.; ISBELL, F.; KOK, M.; LAVERY, S.D.; LECLÈRE, D.; LOYOLA, R.; LWASA, S.; MCGEOCH, M.; MORI, A.S.; NICHOLSON, E.; OCHOA, J.M.; ÖLLERER, K.; POLASKY, S.; RONDININI, C.; SCHROER, S.; SELOMANE, O.; SHEN, X.; STRASSBURG, B.; RASHID SUMAILA, U.; TITTENSOR, D.P.; TURAK, E.; URBINA, L.; VALLEJOS, M.; VÁZQUEZ-DOMÍNGUEZ, E.; VERBURG, P.H.; VISCONTI, P.; WOODLEY, S.; XU, J. |
|
Afiliación : |
PAUL LEADLEY, Laboratoire d’Ecologie Syste´ matique Evolution, Universite´ Paris-Saclay, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Paris, France.; ANDREW GONZALEZ, Department of Biology, Quebec Centre for Biodiversity Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.; DAVID OBURA, Coastal Oceans Research and Development (CORDIO) East Africa, Mombasa, Kenya.; CORNELIA B. KRUG, Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.; MARIA CECILIA LONDOÑO-MURCIA, Scopus Research Institute of Biological Resources Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia.; KATIE L. MILLETTE, Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON), McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.; ADRIANA RADULOVICI, Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON), McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.; ALEKSANDAR RANKOVIC, Paris Institute of Political Studies, Paris, France.; LYNNE J. SHANNON, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.; EMMA ARCHER, Department of Geography, Geoinformatics, and Meteorology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.; FREDERICK ATO ARMAH, Scopus Department of Environmental Science, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.; NIC BAX, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Canberra, NSW, Australia.; KALPANA CHAUDHARI, Institute for Sustainable Development and Research (ISDR), Mumbai, India.; MARK JOHN COSTELLO, Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.; LILIANA M. DÁVALO, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Consortium for Inter-disciplinary Environmental Research, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.; FABIO DE OLIVEIRA ROQUE, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Pioneiros, MS, Brazil.; FABRICE DECLERCK, Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Montpellier, France.; LAURA E. DEE, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.; FRANZ ESSL, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.; SIMON FERRIER, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Canberra, NSW, Australia.; PIERO GENOVESI, Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Rome, Italy.; MANUEL R. GUARIGUATA, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) and World Agroforestry (ICRAF), Lima, Peru,; SHIZUKA HASHIMOTO, Scopus Graduate School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.; CHINWE IFEJIKA SPERANZA, Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.; FOREST ISBELL, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.; MARCEL KOK, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, the Hague, the Netherlands.; SHANE D. LAVERY, School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Marine Science University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.; DAVID LECLÈRE, Biodiversity and Natural Resources Program (BNR), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria.; RAFAEL LOYOLA, International Institute for Sustainability, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.; SHUAIB LWASA, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.; MELODIE MCGEOCH, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environment, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.; AKIRA S. MORI, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.; EMILY NICHOLSON, Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Science, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.; JOSE M. OCHOA, Coral Reef Ecosystems Lab, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.; KINGA ÖLLERER, Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary.; STEPHEN POLASKY, Department of Applied Economics and Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.; CARLO RONDININI, Department of Biology and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.; SIBYLLE SCHROER, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, German.; ODIRILWE SELOMANE, Centre for Sustainability Transitions, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.; XIAOLI SHEN, State key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.; BERNARDO STRASSBURG, International Institute for Sustainability, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazi.; USSIF RASHID SUMAILA, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.; DEREK P. TITTENSOR, Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.; EREN TURAK, New South Wales Department of Planning, Industry, and Environment, Parramatta, NSW, Australia.; LUIS URBINA, Coral Reef Ecosystems Lab, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.; MARÍA VALLEJOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay./Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; ELLA VÁZQUEZ-DOMÍNGUEZ, Scopus Departamento de Ecología de la Biodiversidad, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.; PETER H. VERBURG, Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.; PIERO VISCONTI, Biodiversity and Natural Resources Program (BNR), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria.; STEPHEN WOODLEY, International Union for Conservation of Nature World Commission on Protected Areas (IUCN WCPA), Chelsea, QC, Canada.; JIANCHU XU, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China. |
|
Título : |
Achieving global biodiversity goals by 2050 requires urgent and integrated actions. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
One Earth, 2022, Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 597-603. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.05.009 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.oneear.2022.05.009 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Artticle history: Available online 17 June 2022, Version of Record 17 June 2022. |
|
Contenido : |
Human impacts on the Earth's biosphere are driving the global biodiversity crisis. Governments are preparing to agree on a set of actions intended to halt the loss of biodiversity and put it on a path to recovery by 2050. We provide evidence that the proposed actions can bend the curve for biodiversity, but only if these actions are implemented urgently and in an integrated manner |
|
Palabras claves : |
Earth's biosphere; Global biodiversity crisis; Global biodiversity framework; Human impacts; PLATAFORMA DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SALUD ANIMAL; PLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMAL. |
|
Thesagro : |
BIODIVERSIDAD. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02703naa a2200829 a 4500
001 1063438
005 2022-07-20
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.oneear.2022.05.009$2DOI
100 1 $aLEADLEY, P.
245 $aAchieving global biodiversity goals by 2050 requires urgent and integrated actions.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArtticle history: Available online 17 June 2022, Version of Record 17 June 2022.
520 $aHuman impacts on the Earth's biosphere are driving the global biodiversity crisis. Governments are preparing to agree on a set of actions intended to halt the loss of biodiversity and put it on a path to recovery by 2050. We provide evidence that the proposed actions can bend the curve for biodiversity, but only if these actions are implemented urgently and in an integrated manner
650 $aBIODIVERSIDAD
653 $aEarth's biosphere
653 $aGlobal biodiversity crisis
653 $aGlobal biodiversity framework
653 $aHuman impacts
653 $aPLATAFORMA DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SALUD ANIMAL
653 $aPLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMAL
700 1 $aGONZALEZ, A.
700 1 $aOBURA, D.
700 1 $aKRUG, C.B.
700 1 $aLONDOÑO-MURCIA, M.C.
700 1 $aMILLETTE, K.L.
700 1 $aRADULOVICI, A.
700 1 $aRANKOVIC, A.
700 1 $aSHANNON, L.J.
700 1 $aARCHER, E.
700 1 $aATO ARMAH, F.
700 1 $aNIC BAX, N,
700 1 $aCHAUDHARI, K.
700 1 $aCOSTELLO, M.J.
700 1 $aDÁVALOS, L.M.
700 1 $aROQUE, F DE O
700 1 $aDECLERCK, F.
700 1 $aDEE, L.E.
700 1 $aESSL, F.
700 1 $aFERRIER, S.
700 1 $aGENOVESI, P.
700 1 $aGUARIGUATA, M.R.
700 1 $aHASHIMOTO, S.
700 1 $aIFEJIKA SPERANZA, CH.
700 1 $aISBELL, F.
700 1 $aKOK, M.
700 1 $aLAVERY, S.D.
700 1 $aLECLÈRE, D.
700 1 $aLOYOLA, R.
700 1 $aLWASA, S.
700 1 $aMCGEOCH, M.
700 1 $aMORI, A.S.
700 1 $aNICHOLSON, E.
700 1 $aOCHOA, J.M.
700 1 $aÖLLERER, K.
700 1 $aPOLASKY, S.
700 1 $aRONDININI, C.
700 1 $aSCHROER, S.
700 1 $aSELOMANE, O.
700 1 $aSHEN, X.
700 1 $aSTRASSBURG, B.
700 1 $aRASHID SUMAILA, U.
700 1 $aTITTENSOR, D.P.
700 1 $aTURAK, E.
700 1 $aURBINA, L.
700 1 $aVALLEJOS, M.
700 1 $aVÁZQUEZ-DOMÍNGUEZ, E.
700 1 $aVERBURG, P.H.
700 1 $aVISCONTI, P.
700 1 $aWOODLEY, S.
700 1 $aXU, J.
773 $tOne Earth, 2022, Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 597-603. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.05.009
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
08/06/2015 |
|
Actualizado : |
13/05/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
DE BARBIERI, I.; GULINO, L.; HEGARTY, R.S.; ODDY, V.H.; MAQUIRE, A.; LI, L.; KLIEVE, A.V.; OUWERKERK, D. |
|
Afiliación : |
LUIS IGNACIO DE BARBIERI ETCHEBERRY, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LISA MAREE GULINO, Rumen Ecology Unit, Queensland Department of Agriculture, Australia; Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; ROGER STEPHEN HEGARTY, a School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia; VICTOR ODDY, Beef Industry Centre, Department of Primary Industries NSW, Armidale, NSW, Australia; ANITA J. MAGUIRE, Rumen Ecology Unit, Queensland Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; L. LI, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia; ATHOL V. KLIEVE, Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia; DIANE J. OUWERKERK, Rumen Ecology Unit, Queensland Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. |
|
Título : |
Production attributes of Merino sheep genetically divergent for wool growth are reflected in differing rumen microbiotas. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Livestock Science, Volume 178, August 2015, Pages 119-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.05.023 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.livsci.2015.05.023 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 13 October 2014; Received in revised form 7 May 2015; Accepted 17 May 2015. Acknowledgments: The authors thank Alistair Donaldson, Reginald Woodgate, Gary Taylor, Damien Finn, and Ros Gilbert for their collaboration. Ignacio De Barbieri was supported by National Institute for Agricultural Research (INIA Uruguay). Financial support for this project was also provided by the Australian Government's the Rumen Pangenome project within Filling the Research Gap (FTRG-1194147-75) program. |
|
Contenido : |
Divergent genetic selection for wool growth as a single trait has led to major changes in sheep physiology and metabolism, including variations in rumen microbial protein production and uptake of ?-amino nitrogen in portal blood. This study was conducted to determine if sheep with different genetic merit for wool growth exhibit distinct rumen bacterial diversity. Eighteen Merino wethers were separated into groups of contrasting genetic merit for clean fleece weight (CFW; low: WG? and high: WG+) and fed a blend of oaten and lucerne chaff diet at two levels of intake (LOI; 1 or 1.5 times maintenance energy requirements) for two seven-week periods in a crossover design. Bacterial diversity in rumen fluid collected by esophageal intubation was characterized using 454 amplicon pyrosequencing of the V3/V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene. Bacterial diversity estimated by Phylogenetic distance, Chao1 and observed species did not differ significantly with CFW or LOI; however, the Shannon diversity index differed (P=0.04) between WG+ (7.67) and WG? sheep (8.02). WG+ animals had a higher (P=0.03) proportion of Bacteroidetes (71.9% vs 66.5%) and a lower (P=0.04) proportion of Firmicutes (26.6% vs 31.6%) than WG? animals. Twenty-four specific operational taxonomic units (OTUs), belonging to the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes phyla, were shared among all the samples, whereas specific OTUs varied significantly in presence/abundance (P<0.05) between wool genotypes and 50 varied (P<0.05) with LOI. It appears that genetic selection for fleece weight is associated with differences in rumen bacterial diversity that persist across different feeding levels. Moderate correlations between seven continuous traits, such as methane production or microbial protein production, and the presence and abundance of 17 OTUs were found, indicating scope for targeted modification of the microbiome to improve the energetic efficiency of rumen microbial synthesis and reduce the greenhouse gas footprint of ruminants. MenosDivergent genetic selection for wool growth as a single trait has led to major changes in sheep physiology and metabolism, including variations in rumen microbial protein production and uptake of ?-amino nitrogen in portal blood. This study was conducted to determine if sheep with different genetic merit for wool growth exhibit distinct rumen bacterial diversity. Eighteen Merino wethers were separated into groups of contrasting genetic merit for clean fleece weight (CFW; low: WG? and high: WG+) and fed a blend of oaten and lucerne chaff diet at two levels of intake (LOI; 1 or 1.5 times maintenance energy requirements) for two seven-week periods in a crossover design. Bacterial diversity in rumen fluid collected by esophageal intubation was characterized using 454 amplicon pyrosequencing of the V3/V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene. Bacterial diversity estimated by Phylogenetic distance, Chao1 and observed species did not differ significantly with CFW or LOI; however, the Shannon diversity index differed (P=0.04) between WG+ (7.67) and WG? sheep (8.02). WG+ animals had a higher (P=0.03) proportion of Bacteroidetes (71.9% vs 66.5%) and a lower (P=0.04) proportion of Firmicutes (26.6% vs 31.6%) than WG? animals. Twenty-four specific operational taxonomic units (OTUs), belonging to the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes phyla, were shared among all the samples, whereas specific OTUs varied significantly in presence/abundance (P<0.05) between wool genotypes and 50 varied (P<0.05) with LOI... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
BACTERIAL COMMUNITIES; LEVEL OF INTAKE; QIIME; RUMEN ECOLOGY; WOOL GENOTYPTE. |
|
Thesagro : |
GENOTIPOS; LANA; MERINO; OVINOS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03480naa a2200337 a 4500
001 1052743
005 2020-05-13
008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.livsci.2015.05.023$2DOI
100 1 $aDE BARBIERI, I.
245 $aProduction attributes of Merino sheep genetically divergent for wool growth are reflected in differing rumen microbiotas.
260 $c2015
500 $aArticle history: Received 13 October 2014; Received in revised form 7 May 2015; Accepted 17 May 2015. Acknowledgments: The authors thank Alistair Donaldson, Reginald Woodgate, Gary Taylor, Damien Finn, and Ros Gilbert for their collaboration. Ignacio De Barbieri was supported by National Institute for Agricultural Research (INIA Uruguay). Financial support for this project was also provided by the Australian Government's the Rumen Pangenome project within Filling the Research Gap (FTRG-1194147-75) program.
520 $aDivergent genetic selection for wool growth as a single trait has led to major changes in sheep physiology and metabolism, including variations in rumen microbial protein production and uptake of ?-amino nitrogen in portal blood. This study was conducted to determine if sheep with different genetic merit for wool growth exhibit distinct rumen bacterial diversity. Eighteen Merino wethers were separated into groups of contrasting genetic merit for clean fleece weight (CFW; low: WG? and high: WG+) and fed a blend of oaten and lucerne chaff diet at two levels of intake (LOI; 1 or 1.5 times maintenance energy requirements) for two seven-week periods in a crossover design. Bacterial diversity in rumen fluid collected by esophageal intubation was characterized using 454 amplicon pyrosequencing of the V3/V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene. Bacterial diversity estimated by Phylogenetic distance, Chao1 and observed species did not differ significantly with CFW or LOI; however, the Shannon diversity index differed (P=0.04) between WG+ (7.67) and WG? sheep (8.02). WG+ animals had a higher (P=0.03) proportion of Bacteroidetes (71.9% vs 66.5%) and a lower (P=0.04) proportion of Firmicutes (26.6% vs 31.6%) than WG? animals. Twenty-four specific operational taxonomic units (OTUs), belonging to the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes phyla, were shared among all the samples, whereas specific OTUs varied significantly in presence/abundance (P<0.05) between wool genotypes and 50 varied (P<0.05) with LOI. It appears that genetic selection for fleece weight is associated with differences in rumen bacterial diversity that persist across different feeding levels. Moderate correlations between seven continuous traits, such as methane production or microbial protein production, and the presence and abundance of 17 OTUs were found, indicating scope for targeted modification of the microbiome to improve the energetic efficiency of rumen microbial synthesis and reduce the greenhouse gas footprint of ruminants.
650 $aGENOTIPOS
650 $aLANA
650 $aMERINO
650 $aOVINOS
653 $aBACTERIAL COMMUNITIES
653 $aLEVEL OF INTAKE
653 $aQIIME
653 $aRUMEN ECOLOGY
653 $aWOOL GENOTYPTE
700 1 $aGULINO, L.
700 1 $aHEGARTY, R.S.
700 1 $aODDY, V.H.
700 1 $aMAQUIRE, A.
700 1 $aLI, L.
700 1 $aKLIEVE, A.V.
700 1 $aOUWERKERK, D.
773 $tLivestock Science, Volume 178, August 2015, Pages 119-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.05.023
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
